[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Making it easy to add system calls
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Your patch makes it impossible to tell at an easy glance which syscall
> is which number. The current code makes it quite obvious which numbers
> are assigned to which syscalls, and which syscall numbers are available
> for use. We lose valuable information with this patch, even if it does
> wind up to be functionally equivalent.

Of course the numbers as well as comments on the inactive or unused
entries could be added, just as they are today. I had also considered
the possiblility of adding the system call proto type as a parameter
in the macro. This could lead to a rather complete one entry
description of the call.

Still, it seems to not be in favor, so I will let it drop.

George Anzinger
Preemption patch:

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.036 / U:0.168 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site