[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectHT and idle = poll
The test:  kernbench (average of  kernel compiles5) with -j2 on a 2 physical/4 
logical P4 system. This is on 2.5.64-HTschedB3:

idle != poll: Elapsed: 136.692s User: 249.846s System: 30.596s CPU: 204.8%
idle = poll: Elapsed: 161.868s User: 295.738s System: 32.966s CPU: 202.6%

A 15.5% increase in compile times.

So, don't use idle=poll with HT when you know your workload has idle time! I
have not tried oprofile, but it stands to reason that this would be a
problem. There's no point in using idle=poll with oprofile and HT anyway, as
the cpu utilization is totally wrong with HT to begin with (more on that

Presumably a logical cpu polling while idle uses too many cpu resources
unnecessarily and significantly affects the performance of its sibling.

-Andrew Theurer

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.055 / U:1.924 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site