Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 6 Mar 2003 01:42:27 +0100 | From | Dave Jones <> | Subject | Re: Linux 2.5.64 |
| |
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 01:06:37AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Only the bits that did the module locking crap, which > > is unnecessary afaics. If you look at the files touched, > > there's still nowayout used in the other functions. > > You need to lock the module in memory in the nowayout case > Otherwise the module can be unloaded (which is ok), and then > reloaded (which is not). > > So yes, you broke NOWAYOUT. Its a bit subtle and under > documented I admit.
Bugger. Ok, I'll add that to the TODO.
Dave
-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |