Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 05 Mar 2003 13:34:22 -0800 | From | "Martin J. Bligh" <> | Subject | Re: High Mem Options |
| |
> Ah, if you are referring to a number from me, that was with 2.4 and > that number seemed high to me at the time. I don't believe that 10% > *should* be the amount of degradation. But I don't have current numbers > (that I can share, anyway ;-) that prove anything less than that. > > I expect that we'll be diving into this more over the next few months > as we can generate some large workloads and find the cause of the > degradation (and hopefully minimize it).
Would also be useful to measure the overhead on a machine with < 4Gb of RAM ... otherwise you have two effects to deal with:
1. the PAE overhead. 2. The increase in RAM - more data to manage, and potential bounce-buffers.
M.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |