[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Better CLONE_SETTLS support for Hammer
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 11:32:36AM -0800, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> > If you just want to save one mmap/allocation: I think the context switch
> > overhead will be more expensive than the allocation.
> And two more things:
> 1. every process will already use the prctl(ARCH_SET_FS). We are
> talking here only about the 2nd thread and later. We need to use
> prctl(ARCH_SET_FS) for TLS support.

Not when you put it into the first four GB. Then you can use the same
calls as 32bit.

> 2. May I remind you that you were in the crowd who complained when we
> requested a dedicated thread register? Yes, I still would prefer that
> but I have no energy to battle for that.

I don't see the connection.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.055 / U:2.572 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site