[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Reserving physical memory at boot time
On 5 Mar 2003 07:04:51 -0800
"H. Peter Anvin" <> wrote:

| Followup to: <>
| By author: "Randy.Dunlap" <>
| In newsgroup:
| >
| > OK, with feeling:
| >
| > I agree with you since the boot protocol is well-defined.
| >
| > Just to be clear, my comment was referring to
| > Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt, not to any C code.
| >
| > And it would really be helpful to catch issues like this soon
| > after they happen...
| >
| Unfortunately last time I commented on this the response was roughly
| "well, the patch already made it into Linus' kernel, it's too late to
| fix it now." That isn't exactly a very helpful response.

I don't see why it's too late. How can it be too late?
Ah, because it's already made it into 2.4?

| The mem= parameter has the semantic in the i386/PC boot protocol that
| it specifies the top address of the usable memory region that begins
| at 0x100000. It's a bit of a wart that the boot loaders have to be
| aware of this, but it's so and it's been so for a very long time.

So it's the top of the 0x100000-mem physical linear memory region
(i.e., no gaps)?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.145 / U:3.936 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site