lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.63-mm2 + i/o schedulers with contest
Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:
>
> Mem_load result of AS being slower was just plain weird with the result rising
> from 100 to 150 during testing.
>

Maybe we should just swap computers or something?

Finished compiling kernel: elapsed: 145 user: 180 system: 18
Finished mem_load: elapsed: 146 user: 0 system: 2 loads: 5000
Finished compiling kernel: elapsed: 135 user: 181 system: 17
Finished mem_load: elapsed: 136 user: 0 system: 2 loads: 4800
Finished compiling kernel: elapsed: 129 user: 181 system: 17
Finished mem_load: elapsed: 130 user: 0 system: 2 loads: 4800

256MB, dual CPU, ext3/IDE.

Whereas 2.5.63+bk gives:

Finished compiling kernel: elapsed: 131 user: 182 system: 17
Finished mem_load: elapsed: 131 user: 0 system: 1 loads: 4900
Finished compiling kernel: elapsed: 135 user: 182 system: 17
Finished mem_load: elapsed: 135 user: 0 system: 1 loads: 4800
Finished compiling kernel: elapsed: 129 user: 182 system: 17
Finished mem_load: elapsed: 129 user: 0 system: 1 loads: 4600

Conceivably swap fragmentation, but unlikely. Is it still doing a swapoff
between runs?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.037 / U:3.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site