[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] kernel source spellchecker
Steven Cole wrote:
> BTW, I ran the script using only the first 10 entries
> of spell-fix.txt (an arbitrary choice), and got a pretty big diff:
> 132 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 199 deletions(-)
> My feeling is that patches should be about 1/4 that size.
> Otherwise, Linus may /dev/null them. Second opinion anyone?

I agree with the 1/4th, but in # of lines of spell-fix.txt, not
in output size.

Looking at the changesets he's accepted, it looks like he's
comfortable with changesets of 100 files (see "don't" fixes at )
It probably helps that this was a single kind of change.

My guess is these things need enough manual reviewing
that keeping it down to just a related group of fixes per patch
is a good idea (e.g.
together are a Good Idea, more is probably bad).

BTW Linus has been accepting so many spell fixes it's probably important
to work with very fresh sources...
- Dan

Dan Kegel

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.075 / U:1.980 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site