[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Horrible L2 cache effects from kernel compile

On 3 Mar 2003, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 19:13, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > dentry itself. Yes, you could make it smaller (you could remove the inline
> > string from it, for example, and you could avoid allocating it at
> How about at least making the inline string align to the slab alignment so we
> dont waste space ?

2.5.x does that already:

(sizeof(struct dentry)-offsetof(struct dentry,d_iname))

with the DNAME_INLINE_LEN_MIN just being exactly what the name says: the
minimum size.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.043 / U:0.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site