[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2.5.63] Teach page_mapped about the anon flag
Dave McCracken <> wrote:
> --On Monday, March 03, 2003 13:12:10 -0800 Andrew Morton <>
> wrote:
> > It is. All callers which need to be 100% accurate are under
> > pte_chain_lock().
> Hmm, good point. Some places may not need perfect accuracy. Also, if it
> gives a false positive it means someone else is doing an atomic op on it,
> so it's likely to be in transition to/from true anyway.
> Ok, you've convinced me. Please ignore the patch. I'll hang onto it in
> case we get proved wrong at some point.

We do need a patch I think. page_mapped() is still assuming that an
all-bits-zero atomic_t corresponds to a zero-value atomic_t.

This does appear to be true for all supported architectures, but it's a bit

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.119 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site