[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Fallback to PCI IRQs for TI bridges
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 12:56:20PM -0800, David Hinds wrote:
> > I think it CONFIG_ISA is meant to be that. The "ISA support" is so
> > trivial from the kernel perspective, that the line between systems with
> > and without ISA is somewhat blurred.
> I don't really know what the scope of CONFIG_ISA should be. I think
> now it is mainly used to show or hide drivers for ISA cards, rather
> than describing a system capability.

In my bunch of PCMCIA/Cardbus/PCI changes, I have one patch which
decouples CONFIG_ISA from the PCMCIA subsystem, replacing it with
CONFIG_PCMCIA_PROBE - on statically mapped PCMCIA systems (eg, SA1110)
all the region probing, resource handling, and interrupt stuff is
rather heavy weight. However, decoupling it from CONFIG_ISA would
allow all that supporting code to remain when required for some socket

I'm working through getting stuff tested and in to Linus in a reasonable
way. Of course, this won't help for 2.4 based kernels, although the
CONFIG_PCMCIA_PROBE has existed in the ARM tree for a fair while and
could, given someone with enough motivation, the relevant changes could
be dug out and submitted to Marcello.

Russell King ( The developer of ARM Linux

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.047 / U:6.700 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site