lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRE: [PATCH] cciss: add passthrough ioctl
From
Date
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 16:17, Cameron, Steve wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 09:26:40AM +0600, Stephen Cameron wrote:
> > > Because, in order to flash the array controller firmware,
> > > it's got to be done that way...
> >
> > I don't buy this. Sorry. What's against creating a device for this
> > controller itself ?
> > (And yes, the kernel could use a formal ioctl number for "upgrade firmware")
>
> Arg. Now I wish I didn't already port that code to 10 distributions.
> Please shoot me.
>
> How do you want it done?

I really think it should stay as it is for now. Maybe in 2.7 we need to have
the firmware update argument, but we need to have it about *all* related
drivers and do it once and right.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.045 / U:7.672 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site