lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25
    >> akpm has suggested something like this in the past.  I respectfully 
    >> disagree.
    >
    > I also disagree. Although it would be nice, it's not practical. What
    > people want is strictly fixes and security related patches, and that
    > is ALL I propose to want to include. Perhaps if the vendors
    > want a "common vendor" patch they could maintain it? ;)

    I still think the common vendor kernel is valuable, but different ;-)
    A straight fixes tree is valuable too ... thanks.

    M.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:4.306 / U:0.292 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site