Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 23 Mar 2003 14:57:41 -0800 | From | "Martin J. Bligh" <> | Subject | Re: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25 |
| |
>> akpm has suggested something like this in the past. I respectfully >> disagree. > > I also disagree. Although it would be nice, it's not practical. What > people want is strictly fixes and security related patches, and that > is ALL I propose to want to include. Perhaps if the vendors > want a "common vendor" patch they could maintain it? ;)
I still think the common vendor kernel is valuable, but different ;-) A straight fixes tree is valuable too ... thanks.
M.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |