Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 20 Mar 2003 09:04:49 +0100 | From | Jens Axboe <> | Subject | Re: WimMark I report for 2.5.65-mm2 |
| |
On Wed, Mar 19 2003, Joel Becker wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 05:57:26PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com> wrote: > > > > > > WimMark I report for 2.5.65-mm2 > > > > > > Runs: 1374.22 1487.19 1437.26 > > > > > > > That is with elevator=as? > > Yes, it is as. On Nick's recommendation I didn't consider a > deadline run a priority. The regular deadline runs have been 1550-1590, > which is indeed statistically significant.
Hmm that's a bit odd IMHO, the deadline runs are nice for comparison. If there's a variation between -mmX and -mmY, and deadline + as have consistent scores, then it would be a good clue.
Besides, deadline is still the most solid choice.
-- Jens Axboe
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |