[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] kernel source spellchecker
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 09:09:10AM +0100, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 07:02:00PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > My corrections file is up at
> > and the patch that produces is
> >
> > The perl script took about an hour of 450MHz cpu time.
> > (Might be worth adding a quick path to detect and skip
> > files with none of the misspelled words. Or just run
> > on a fast machine...)
> OK. Next Take.
> Changes this time:
> - A bug-fix for "--dir" (Would have checked all files)
> - Added a "fast-path" but this doesn't seem to make a difference
> New options:
> - "--[no]fix" to fix (default) or only look for errors.
> (This ignores the '[no]comment'-option and looks for all errors!)
> - "--[no]override" to override(default) the original file or create a
> "<filename>.fixed"-file
> Anyone wants a "--[no]ask"-option?

Earlier or later the "missing-attachment"-thing must happen to anyone.

Bis denn

Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer
wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated,
cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.

[unhandled content-type:application/x-perl]
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.078 / U:2.768 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site