lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] remove DEVFS_FL_AUTO_DEVNUM
Date
Followup to:  <20030301190724.B1900@lst.de>
By author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Rationale: while dynamic major/minors are a good idea, devfs is the
> wrong layer to do it because all code relying on it would break with
> out devfs.
>

Your first clause here is a *highly* questionable statement...

-hpa
--
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
Architectures needed: cris ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.041 / U:2.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site