Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: 2.5.65-mm2 | From | "Steven P. Cole" <> | Date | 19 Mar 2003 16:19:04 -0700 |
| |
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 16:04, Robert Love wrote: > On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 17:51, Steven P. Cole wrote: > > > I'll try the different value of max_timeslice with dbench on > > reiserfs next. That's where the lack of response was most evident. > > I am curious as to whether reverting sched-D4 fixes this. > > If not, the first step is seeing whether this is a bad decision made by > the interactivity estimator. Something like: > > ps -eo pid,nice,priority,command > > for dbench, evolution, and X might be useful. > > Thanks, > > Robert Love > In the meantime, Andrew has asked me to revert the sched-D3 patch. I'm recompiling now, and will only have time for that test before I have to go do other things.
Steven - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |