[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] fix nanosleep() granularity bumps
george anzinger <> wrote:
> Here is a fix for the problem that eliminates the index from the
> structure. The index ALWAYS depends on the current value of
> base->timer_jiffies in a rather simple way which is I exploit. Either
> patch works, but this seems much simpler...

Seems to be a nice change. I think it would be better to get Tim's fix into
Linus's tree and let your rationalisation bake for a while in -mm.

There is currently a mysterious timer lockup happening on power4 machines.
I'd like to keep these changes well-separated in time so we can get an
understanding of what code changes correlate with changed behaviour.

There are timer changes in Linus's post-2.5.65 tree and your patch generates
zillions of rejects against everything. Can you send me a diff against
Linus's latest sometime?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.043 / U:1.504 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site