lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: 2.4.20-ac2 Memory Leak?
From
Date
Martin Josefsson <gandalf@wlug.westbo.se> writes:

> On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 00:46, Greg Stark wrote:
> > Martin Josefsson <gandalf@wlug.westbo.se> writes:
> >
> > > This can be the source of your problems, connections can get very long
> > > timeouts and stay in ip_conntrack.
> >
> > Is there a way to list the connections and confirm this is the problem?
> > It seems it would require an awful lot of connections to consume megabytes of
> > memory.
>
> cat /proc/net/ip_conntrack
>
> The third field is the timeout in seconds.
> The fourth field is the state of the connection, if it's TIME_WAIT with
> a large timeout then it's the list handling bug. (iirc it was TIME_WAIT
> that showed the problem...)

Nope, a total of 16 entries in ip_conntrack, one of which is in TIME_WAIT with
a timeout of 2m.



> The default tcp timeout is 5 days for esatblished connections.
>
> There's a patch in patch-o-matic that enables you to tune the timeouts
> without having to edit the source. Instructions on how to get
> patch-o-matic are availiable on http://www.netfilter.org

Thanks.

--
greg

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.035 / U:0.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site