lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] dev_t [1/3]
Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:
>
> From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
>
> > So, kill cdev_cachep, cdev_cache_init,
> > cdfind, cdget, cdput, inode->i_cdev, struct char_device.
> > All of this is dead code today.
>
> You're also removing refcount code... why not fix it up instead?
>
> I agree your patch is mostly correct from a "today" standpoint,
> but from a long term standpoint ...
>
> Your remarks have been made a few times already, and each
> time I answered that my objective was to give Linux 2.6
> a 32-bit dev_t, and my objective is not to do work that
> is not for 2.6 but for 2.8.
>

What does that whole hash/cache/refcount setup in there actually do, and why
can we afford to remove it for 2.6?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.030 / U:0.384 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site