Messages in this thread |  | | From | Bernd Eckenfels <> | Subject | Re: FileSystem XFS vs RiserFS vs ext3 | Date | Mon, 17 Mar 2003 09:32:37 +0100 |
| |
In article <3E7556C2.7030000@thizgroup.com> you wrote: > Hi all I get basic understanding of the functions and different between > XFS, RiserFS and ext3. But in high volumn read write enviornment (database, > NFS email server etc), which will provide better preformance?
NFS is a bit tricky. Reiser used to be broken on it, and at least from large XFS NFS Servers I know that they tend to be unstable, still.
For the Database Servers, I am not sure how well they operate with journaling filesystems. I think Linux Journal had an article on performance on that.
Reiser might be your bet, depending on the usage pattern of the filename space, with Ext3 catching up. Personally I love the XFS features for resizing in connection with LVMs, but i guess you can have that with Ext3 and Reiser, too.
Greetings Bernd -- eckes privat - http://www.eckes.org/ Project Freefire - http://www.freefire.org/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |