[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
Subject[BUG & WORKAROUND] nanosleep() granularity bumps up in 2.5.64
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Tim Schmielau wrote:

> On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Vitezslav Samel wrote:
> > The nanosleep() bug narrowed down to 2.5.63-bk2. That's version, the "initial
> > jiffies" patch went in. And yes, it's on i686 machine.
> You can easily check whether it's connected with this change by setting
> INITIAL_JIFFIES to zero. This should exactly recover the previous
> situation.

OK. I've done the test myself and I plead guilty. As a temporary
workaround you can apply the following patch:

--- linux-2.5.64/include/linux/time.h.orig Wed Mar 5 04:29:24 2003
+++ linux-2.5.64/include/linux/time.h Mon Mar 17 20:31:06 2003
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
* Have the 32 bit jiffies value wrap 5 minutes after boot
* so jiffies wrap bugs show up earlier.
-#define INITIAL_JIFFIES ((unsigned int) (-300*HZ))

* Change timeval to jiffies, trying to avoid the

Still, after half an hour of glancing at the code I can't see my mistake.
I've re-checked that the problem does not occur with the original "initial
jiffies" patch for 2.4. So I must have missed a (subtle?) difference
between 2.4 and 2.5 when I did the forward-port.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.085 / U:0.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site