lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subjectre: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Tomas Szepe wrote:

> > [alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk]
> >
> > On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 18:20, Tomas Szepe wrote:
> > > Is this critical enough for 2.4.21 to go out? Or can it wait like
> > > some other fairly serious stuff such as the ext3 fixes? What about
> > > the current state of IDE?
> > >
> > > Would it make sense to repackage 2.4.20 into something like 2.4.20-p1
> > > or 2.4.20.1 with only the critical stuff applied?
> >
> > If you build your own kernels apply the patch, if you use vendor kernels
> > then you can expect vendor kernel updates to appear or have already
> > appeared
>
> You have avoided the question(s). 8)

I think Alan's trying to teach us how to fish ;-)

That said, IMVHO something like this does constitute an argument for
2.4.20-p1 (due to the amount of change that's already racked up for
2.2.21).

Regards,
Neale.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.095 / U:2.224 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site