[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Why is get_current() not const function?
Date (Linus Torvalds) writes:

>> and why on x86-64
>>the movq %%gs:0, %0 inline asm is volatile with "memory" clobber?
> Can't help you on that one, but it looks like it uses various helper
> functions for doing the x86-64 per-processor data structures, and I bet
> those helper functions are shared by _other_ users who definitely want
> to have their data properly re-read. Ie "current()" may be constant in
> process context, but that sure isn't true about a lot of other things in
> the per-processor data structures.

Yes, that's the big issue. const current requires non volatile read_pda()
and making read_pda non volatile breaks lots of code currently and probably
needs an audit over all users.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.024 / U:1.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site