lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] concurrent inode allocation for ext2 against 2.5.64
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 01:51:58PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> hm, I wonder if this should be in a separate cacheline. We may as well use a
>> single lock if they're this close together. Bill, can you test that
>> sometime?

On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 02:06:18PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> Benching now.

Sorry, this should have hit the list earlier.

Throughput 294.388 MB/sec 128 procs
dbench 128 87.22s user 4286.79s system 2984% cpu 2:26.58 total

(the "before" picture was ca. 257MB/s)

vmstat and oprofile info vanished, not sure why. A rerun is possible.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.062 / U:3.948 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site