Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 16 Mar 2003 00:50:45 -0800 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] concurrent inode allocation for ext2 against 2.5.64 |
| |
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 01:51:58PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >> hm, I wonder if this should be in a separate cacheline. We may as well use a >> single lock if they're this close together. Bill, can you test that >> sometime?
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 02:06:18PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > Benching now.
Sorry, this should have hit the list earlier.
Throughput 294.388 MB/sec 128 procs dbench 128 87.22s user 4286.79s system 2984% cpu 2:26.58 total
(the "before" picture was ca. 257MB/s)
vmstat and oprofile info vanished, not sure why. A rerun is possible.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |