[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Complete support PC-9800 for 2.5.64-ac4 (11/11) SCSI
On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 14:00, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On 16 Mar 2003, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 12:36, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Actually, it was my suggestion to remove the dereference for PIO accesses. In
> > > that case SASR contains the I/O port register.
> >
> > There's still something wrong with the implementation in this patch.
> > For non PIO SASR is defined as volatile unsigned char *SASR. Its access
> > has gone from being outb(n, *regs.SASR) to outb(n, regs.SASR). What
> > expansion can outb have on m68k and MIPS that makes this change
> > idempotent?
> outb() and friends are only used if CONFIG_WD33C93_PIO is set. In all other
> cases, it uses the old implementation, e.g. `*regs.SASR = reg_num'.

Ah, OK, I see what it's doing. Instead of having a single redefine of
wd33c93_outb to be either outb or readb etc, it has a whole chunk of
code in wd33c93.c that #ifdef's for this.

Perhaps, while you're cleaning this up, you'd like to move this into the
header? Shouldn't it also be using readb/writeb instead of just direct
memory accesses?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.063 / U:3.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site