[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] update filesystems config. menu
On Sat, 15 Mar 2003 09:08:44 -0800 (PST)
"Randy.Dunlap" <> wrote:

> I'm having trouble decoding...
> What is it that "should be safest for most people"?
> Are you suggesting any changes here?
> And some of us don't use fs modules, just build what we need into the
> kernel. Do you know of any problems with doing this (related to
> ext2/ext3 for example)?

I was just saying that recommending it (ext2) compiled into the kernel
and not a module should be the safe route for newbies to kernel

Those of us that have build a few to feel comfortable with it, will know
to compile the fs of our / partition into the kernel.

Except if ext2 is not the most commonly used fs anymore. I guess a
'cool' feature could be if the make system could 'detect' what your
current root is and warn if you do not have that compiled into your
kernel, but I do not know the limitations of it (the make system).

Then on the other hand, would above be confusing if its a kernel
compiled for another box ?



Martin Schlemmer

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.046 / U:0.836 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site