lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] concurrent block allocation for ext2 against 2.5.64
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 12:24:31AM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> Okay, dump_stack() every once in a while when we schedule() in down().

On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 04:08:19AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Thanks.

No problem. I think we found out a number of things that help everyone.


On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 12:24:31AM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> No good ideas how to script the results so I have the foggiest idea
>> who's the bad guy. gzipped and MIME attached (Sorry!) for space reasons.

On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 04:08:19AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> lock_super() in the ext2 inode allocator mainly. It needs the same treatment.

Terrific! Not only have we resolved 16x ext2 contention issues we've
also identified a clear direction for 32x!!

Go fs hackers go! First 2.5 VM, now 2.6/2.7 VFS. What can't you do?


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.049 / U:1.524 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site