lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Ext2-devel] Re: [PATCH] concurrent block allocation for ext2 against 2.5.64
Andrew Morton (AM) writes:
AM> Nope. What we're trying to measure here is pure in-memory lock
AM> contention, locked bus traffic, context switches, etc, etc. To
AM> do that we need to get the IO system out of the picture.

On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 11:16:10AM +0300, Alex Tomas wrote:
> I simple use own pretty simple test. btw, you may disable preallocation
> to increase allocation rate

This looks very interesting, but it may have to wait ca. 24 hours for
some benchmark time b/c of the long boot times and late hour in .us.

This also looks like it would be a much better stress test, and the
NUMA-Q is known for bringing out many rare races. There is are good
reasons to run this test even aside from performance.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.084 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site