lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] concurrent inode allocation for ext2 against 2.5.64
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 02:37:18PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> Looks like it's gone nuts when 128 processes all try to close lots of
>> files at the same time.
>> One possible reason for this leaping out is that all the instances are now
>> achieving more uniform runtimes. You can tell that by comparing the dbench
>> dots.

On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 02:58:42PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> For some reason this version of dbench doesn't produce dots. I logged
> what it did produce, though. It looks something like this:

There's a problem with the old dbench:

Throughput 82.0899 MB/sec (NB=102.612 MB/sec 820.899 MBit/sec)
$ (time ./dbench/dbench 128) |& tee -a ~/dbench.output.15
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++128 clients started
********************************************************************************************************************************
Throughput 1841.38 MB/sec (NB=2301.72 MB/sec 18413.8 MBit/sec)
./dbench/dbench 128 73.31s user 6.75s system 1802% cpu 4.440 total

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.064 / U:1.964 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site