Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 15 Mar 2003 17:29:17 -0500 | From | Willem Riede <> | Subject | Re: Any hope for ide-scsi (error handling)? |
| |
On 2003.03.15 16:11 Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, Willem Riede wrote: > > > It may not be elegant to schedule(1) with the lock taken, but it > > does work. > > > > However, my latest patch doesn't seem to be applied, since in my > > version I have a set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); before > > the schedule. > > Yeah but what happens when a task tries to acquire ide_lock?
It gets to wait until I'm done.
Regards, Willem Riede. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |