[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] concurrent inode allocation for ext2 against 2.5.64
At some point in the past, Alex Tomas wrote:
>> struct ext2_bg_info {
>> u8 debts;
>> spinlock_t balloc_lock;
>> + spinlock_t ialloc_lock;
>> unsigned int reserved;
>> } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;

On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 01:51:58PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> hm, I wonder if this should be in a separate cacheline. We may as well use a
> single lock if they're this close together. Bill, can you test that
> sometime?

Benching now.

-- wli
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:0.087 / U:1.892 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site