Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 15 Mar 2003 14:06:18 -0800 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] concurrent inode allocation for ext2 against 2.5.64 |
| |
At some point in the past, Alex Tomas wrote: >> struct ext2_bg_info { >> u8 debts; >> spinlock_t balloc_lock; >> + spinlock_t ialloc_lock; >> unsigned int reserved; >> } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 01:51:58PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > hm, I wonder if this should be in a separate cacheline. We may as well use a > single lock if they're this close together. Bill, can you test that > sometime?
Benching now.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |