[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone
    > Yes.
    > Some kind of better-patch is badly needed.
    > What kind of data would have to be in soft-changeset?
    > * unique id of changeset
    > * unique id of previous changeset
    > (two previous if it is merge)
    > ? or would it be better to have here
    > whole path to first change?
    > * commit comment
    > * for each file:
    > ** diff -u of change
    > ** file's unique id
    > ** in case of rename: new name (delete is rename to special dir)
    > ** in case of chmod/chown: new permissions
    > ** per-file comment
    > ? How to handle directory moves?
    > Does it seem sane? Any comments?

    Looks good to me.

    If people keep changesets sanely, then there should be no need for
    per-file comments IMHO, but I'm sure that's a matter of debate.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.020 / U:3.024 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site