lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [2.4] init/do_mounts.c::rd_load_image() memleak
    Date
    From
    Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> said:
    > On Fri, Mar 14 2003, Oleg Drokin wrote:

    [...]

    > > Do you propose somebody should go and fix all
    > > if ( something )
    > > kfree(something);
    > > pieces of code to read just
    > > kfree(something); ?

    > No that would just be another pointless exercise in causing more
    > annoyance for someone who has to look through patches finding that one
    > hunk that breaks stuff. The recent spelling changes come to mind.

    By that standard, most janitorial patches should be ditched. That way, no
    cruft will ever be removed.

    Instead of this extremist position, some way should be found that minimizes
    this kind of friction.
    --
    Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
    Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431
    Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239
    Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.021 / U:0.096 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site