lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.5.64-mm6
Alex Tomas <bzzz@tmi.comex.ru> wrote:
>
> >>>>> Andrew Morton (AM) writes:
>
> AM> jlnance@unity.ncsu.edu wrote:
> >>
> >> Andrew, I am not sure what you mean by this. Are you saying that
> >> the way ld accesses files causes the blocks on the disk to be
> >> layed out poorly? That is the only thing I can think of that
> >> would get fixed by copying.
> >>
>
> AM> Exactly that. ld seeks all over the file when adding new blocks
> AM> to it, so with ext2 and ext3 (at least) there is poor
> AM> correspondence between file offset and block indices.
>
>
> hmm. I thought delayed allocation should solve this problem. Isn't it?

Absolutely. XFS shouldn't have this problem.

I have patches (against 2.5.7!) which get it all working for ext2
as well.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.039 / U:7.716 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site