[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Kernel setup() and initrd problems
Followup to:  <>
By author: Kai Germaschewski <>
In newsgroup:
> I think whoever came up with that just got the idea of pivot_root wrong.
> The idea was to get rid of the initrd special case. It should be possible
> to do the following, though I didn't work out the details:
> Tell the kernel that our root dev is /dev/ram and give it an initrd which
> isn't really a classical initrd (with /linuxrc on it), but instead has a
> /sbin/init which is similar to the linuxrc above.

It *is* possible, but you need to pass "root=/dev/ram0" to the kernel,
for backwards compatibility reasons. That will incidentally make it
run /sbin/init, not /linuxrc, unless you pass init=/linuxrc as well.

See SuperRescue for an example of working use of pivot_root.

<> at work, <> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.047 / U:0.808 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site