[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: is irq smp affinity good for anything?
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 07:17:37AM -0500, Mark Hounschell wrote:
> If you also bind your task to the same cpu and force all other tasks from that
> cpu while doing the same with the irq, your determinism will improve greatly.
> Determinism being the difference in the best and worse case latencies. The
> smaller the better (jitter). This won't increase a single latency time but your
> determinism will be greatly improved.

Thanks so much for your comments

Yes... maybe there is also cache pingpong because common locks are in
different cpus... I'will try it

do you know what's the best/less intrusive patch that allows
task cpu binding?

Thanks in advance again :-)



Debian GNU/Linux: a dream come true
"Computers are useless. They can only give answers." Pablo Picasso

---> Visita para saber acerca de la <---
---> Asociación Valenciana de Usuarios de Linux <---

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.050 / U:4.580 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site