lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: is irq smp affinity good for anything?
From
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 07:17:37AM -0500, Mark Hounschell wrote:
[...]
> If you also bind your task to the same cpu and force all other tasks from that
> cpu while doing the same with the irq, your determinism will improve greatly.
> Determinism being the difference in the best and worse case latencies. The
> smaller the better (jitter). This won't increase a single latency time but your
> determinism will be greatly improved.

Thanks so much for your comments

Yes... maybe there is also cache pingpong because common locks are in
different cpus... I'will try it
do you know what's the best/less intrusive patch that allows
task cpu binding?

Thanks in advance again :-)

regards

Ulisses

Debian GNU/Linux: a dream come true
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Computers are useless. They can only give answers." Pablo Picasso
---> Visita http://www.valux.org/ para saber acerca de la <---
---> Asociación Valenciana de Usuarios de Linux <---
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans