Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Now i2o_core.c memleak/incorrectness? | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | 14 Mar 2003 00:42:55 +0000 |
| |
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 19:38, Oleg Drokin wrote: > Well, it seems that i2o does not always follow this rule. > Also i2o_init_outbound_q() seems not free this "status" thing if everything > went ok, is this intentional? > Or perhaps something like this patch is needed?
I'll take a look. I'm doing a bunch of i2o cleanup in 2.5 right now
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |