Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 13 Mar 2003 12:58:16 -0500 | From | Mark Hounschell <> | Subject | Re: is irq smp affinity good for anything? |
| |
uaca@alumni.uv.es wrote: > > Thanks so much for your comments > > Yes... maybe there is also cache pingpong because common locks are in > different cpus... I'will try it > > do you know what's the best/less intrusive patch that allows > task cpu binding? <--- Probably the least intrusive can be gotten here:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/cpu-affinity/
Or the O(1) schedular patches. That is a little more intrusive though.
Mark - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |