[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: is irq smp affinity good for anything? wrote:
> Thanks so much for your comments
> Yes... maybe there is also cache pingpong because common locks are in
> different cpus... I'will try it
> do you know what's the best/less intrusive patch that allows
> task cpu binding?
Probably the least intrusive can be gotten here:

Or the O(1) schedular patches. That is a little more intrusive though.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.049 / U:11.608 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site