[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH][COMPAT] compat_sys_fcntl{,64} 1/9 Generic part

On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Make the code _look_ good. Not look like SOMEBODY WHO CANNOT TYPE WITHOUT
> > THE SHIFT KEY. Make the thing take properly typed arguments, instead of
> > casting stuff two ways and backwards inside macros.
> you mean like this?

Yes, this looks much more sane. If you _really_ want to be anal about
typechecking (and also checking that nobody can possibly use a user
pointer incorrectly), you make

typedef struct {
unsigned int val;
} compat_uptr_t;

and then use

static inline void *compat_ptr(compat_uptr_t uptr)
return (void *)uptr.val;

which should still result in readable code.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.038 / U:2.220 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site