lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: named vs 2.5.64-mm5
jjs <jjs@tmsusa.com> wrote:
>
> Greetings -
>
> 2.5.64-mm4 and -mm5 seem more rugged than previous
> kernels, but there are a couple of minor nits - one of them
> is the tendency of named (which appears to work reliably
> under 2.4) to go catatonic under recent 2.5.6x kernels -
>
> More verbose kernel logging may shed some light - or is
> this just a red herring? I get a tons of these in 2.5.64-mm5:
>
> <...>
> process `named' is using obsolete setsockopt SO_BSDCOMPAT
> process `named' is using obsolete setsockopt SO_BSDCOMPAT
> process `named' is using obsolete setsockopt SO_BSDCOMPAT
> <...>
>

The changelog has:

# --------------------------------------------
# 03/03/08 jmorris@intercode.com.au 1.1083
# [NET]: Nuke SO_BSDCOMPAT.
# --------------------------------------------

Maybe James can tell us what is going on here.

We should at least place a cap on the number of times that message
is printed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.042 / U:0.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site