lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectAPM vs. ACPI status detection
Hi,

I have a little patch witch sets apm_info.disabled flag not only if APM
disabled by user but if it disabled by SMP or ACPI. Please apply.

<-- Cut here -->
--- ./arch/i386/kernel/apm.c.orig Tue Mar 11 08:59:24 2003
+++ ./arch/i386/kernel/apm.c Tue Mar 11 09:00:30 2003
@@ -1906,10 +1906,12 @@
}
if ((smp_num_cpus > 1) && !power_off) {
printk(KERN_NOTICE "apm: disabled - APM is not SMP safe.\n");
+ apm_info.disabled = 1;
return -ENODEV;
}
if (PM_IS_ACTIVE()) {
printk(KERN_NOTICE "apm: overridden by ACPI.\n");
+ apm_info.disabled = 1;
return -ENODEV;
}
pm_active = 1;
<-- Cut here -->
Regards,
--
Soós Péter Pannonhalmi Főapátság / Archabbey of Pannonhalma
H-9090 Pannonhalma, Vár 1.
Tel: +3696570189, Fax: +3696470011






-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.023 / U:3.444 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site