[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Would the real 82801E_9 please stand up. (fwd)
On Tue, Mar 11 2003, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The issue described in Dave's mail below is still present:
> 2.4.21-pre5-ac1:
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801E_9 0x2459
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801E_11 0x245B
> 2.5.64-ac3:
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801E_9 0x245b
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801E_11 PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801E_9
> Jens:
> The patch that did the
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801E_11 PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801E_9
> in 2.5 was sent by you, could you comment on this issue?

This was during the nasty 2.4-ac IDE merge I did in 2.5, so I wouldn't
trust that particular change completely. The 2.4.21-pre5-ac1 is most
likely the correct one.

Jens Axboe

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.033 / U:1.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site