[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.5.64bk5: X86_PC + HIGHMEM boot failure
On Sun, 09 Mar 2003, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>> changes are in my tree ... I've just checked it, and it doesn't
>> do that for me. It should *allow* you to turn on CONFIG_NUMA
>> (and that might be broken for PCs still) but it shouldn't be on
>> by default ... could you check that you can still disable it?
>> Works for me ...

On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 12:46:05AM -0800, Adam J. Richter wrote:
> Oops. You're right it is possible to deactivate
> CONFIG_NUMA in this kernel under X86_PC, and that avoids
> the problem. I guess there still is the minor issue that
> either CONFIG_NUMA should work with X86_PC + HIGHMEM (even
> on machines without high memory) or else CONFIG_NUMA
> should not be selectable in this case, but that's obviously
> a bug of much less importance.
> Sorry for my misunderstanding of the CONFIG_NUMA configution
> options.

It might help if we could get bootlogs or backtraces from you.

-- wli
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.038 / U:30.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site