lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: TCP Connection times out
Date
Thanks for the prompt reply.
The situation is a bit different. Sorry for not providing all infos:

Actually the printer network interface ACKs all incoming packets
with window size zero

Everything is fine until the standard TCP/IP implementation shifts
a "22" (tp->rto) 31 (tp->backoff) times to the left and sends 16 ACKS in
0.5ms, because it does no timeouts between them.

A "60 minute paper empty"-situation should not cause problems.

I could provide a tcpdump trace of this, if wanted.

Thanks,
martin

On Friday 07 February 2003 14:49, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Martin Zielinski wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I'm not on the list, so I'm not really informed what's going on. But...
> >
> > our problem is a network printer the has paper empty.
> > The socket connection to the printer broke down after ~45 minutes with
> > errno 110 (Connection timed out).
> >
> > Linux base version is 2.4.18 on a strongarm machine.
> >
> > Tracking this down brought us to the tcp_send_probe0 function in
> > net/ipv4/tcp_output.c.
> > The tp->backoff value becomes allways increased.
> > on this machine from 31 on (tp->rto << tp->backoff) is 0.
> >
> > The xmit timer is set to this timeout value - resulting in an ACK burst.
> > If the TCP sender gets the (default) 16 ACKS out, before the receiver can
> > answer them, the connection dies.
> > This happened every night, when the printer received a huge job from a
> > foreign office.
> >
> > If this isn't a bug, it should be made configurable. Or do we miss
> > something?
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> Get new firmware for your printer. It's broken. The connection
> timed out because the connection timed out, i.e., when the printer
> is out of paper, it refuses to ACK incoming packets. You do not
> modify a standard TCP/IP implementation to fix a broken printer.
>
> The printer is expecting to hold-off incoming network data, by
> refusing to ACK it, until someone adds more paper. This is
> unconsionable behavior that violates any standards of Engineering
> practice. There is no time-out you could increase because the
> printer may be out-of-paper forever, i.e., somebody needs to go
> buy some. Network-connected devices just can't do things this
> way. The name of the vendor should be published and the vendor
> "educated" in such a way that no such printers remain connected
> to a network until they are fixed.
>
> And, if Linux didn't follow the standard, and let dead "connected"
> devices remain in a connected state, servers that use connections
> would would become impossible.
>
> Cheers,
> Dick Johnson
> Penguin : Linux version 2.4.18 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips).
> Why is the government concerned about the lunatic fringe? Think about it.

--
Martin Zielinski mz@seh.de

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.051 / U:5.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site