[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.5.59_getcycles_A0
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 06:42:21PM -0800, john stultz wrote:
> > of applications who just need an increasing time stamp in user space,
> > and who do not want to fight ntpd for this. One example for such
> > an application is the X server who needs this for its internal
> > event sequencing.
> >
> > Implementing it based on the current time infrastructure is very easy -
> > you just do not add xtime and wall jiffies in, but only jiffies.
> Actually, we can't do this, because if interrupts are being blocked
> jiffies won't change. That is why I'm trying to provide hardware clock
> access to hangcheck. It just so happened it was using get_cycles() as an
> interface and it seemed appropriate for moving to timer_ops.

monotonic clock can use the hw clock too. It just shouldn't use anything
manipulated by settimeofday()

> > I don't think doing any special hacks and complicating get_cycles()
> > for it is the right way. Just implement a new monotonic clock primitive
> > (and eventually export it to user space too)
> Ok, so you're telling me to use another interface. I'm down with that
> (sometimes I just need it spelled out). Name suggestions?
> read_hw_timer?



To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.055 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site