Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 6 Feb 2003 11:55:08 -0600 | From | Matt Reppert <> | Subject | Re: 2.5 changeset 1.952.4.2 corrupt in fs/jfs/inode.c |
| |
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 09:30:50 -0800 Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com> wrote: > What I'd really like to know is if we really need a glibc2.3 image. > Would the guy who had the segfaults step foward and confirm/deny the > use of the static image? We haven't had any other problem reports > related to glibc2.3 so it may be there is no need to do anything but > kill the static version.
Indeed; I've had time to try the glibc2.2 version, and this seems to work fine running a quick bk changes. The static version is what was segfaulting. Sorry for the noise.
Thanks, Matt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |