lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.5 changeset 1.952.4.2 corrupt in fs/jfs/inode.c
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 09:30:50 -0800
Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com> wrote:
> What I'd really like to know is if we really need a glibc2.3 image.
> Would the guy who had the segfaults step foward and confirm/deny the
> use of the static image? We haven't had any other problem reports
> related to glibc2.3 so it may be there is no need to do anything but
> kill the static version.

Indeed; I've had time to try the glibc2.2 version, and this seems to
work fine running a quick bk changes. The static version is what was
segfaulting. Sorry for the noise.

Thanks,
Matt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.061 / U:0.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site