[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.59
[it would be really nice if you at least Cc'ed me when replying to my mails..

On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 05:16:39PM +0000, David Wagner wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >Well, selinux is still far from a mergeable shape and even needed additional
> >patches to the LSM tree last time I checked. This think of submitting hooks
> >for code that obviously isn't even intende to be merged in mainline is what
> >I really dislike, and it's the root for many problems with LSM.
> You keep bringing up SELinux. Maybe you dislike SELinux; I don't know.
> In any case, LSM is not there just to support SELinux. It's intended
> to support a broad range of security modules and security policies.
> LSM is bigger than just SELinux.

I bring up selinux because it's the only module in the lsm patches that I
consider more than just a bunch of hacks. So, no it's not a dislike but
they only thing I actually consider worth mentioning.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.127 / U:0.896 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site