[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: gcc -O2 vs gcc -Os performance
>> All done with gcc-2.95.4 (Debian Woody). These machines (16x NUMA-Q) have 
>> 700MHz P3 Xeons with 2Mb L2 cache ... -Os might fare better on celeron
>> with a puny cache if someone wants to try that out
> gcc 3.2 is a lot smarter about -Os and it makes a very big size
> difference according to the numbers the from the ACPI guys.
> Im not sure testing with a gcc from the last millenium is useful 8)

I'll retest with gcc-3.2 ... maybe it'll finally show a case where it's
better than 2.95 this way?

<ducks> <runs>


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.124 / U:0.592 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site