lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: gcc -O2 vs gcc -Os performance
    From
    Date
    On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 15:42, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
    > All done with gcc-2.95.4 (Debian Woody). These machines (16x NUMA-Q) have
    > 700MHz P3 Xeons with 2Mb L2 cache ... -Os might fare better on celeron
    > with a puny cache if someone wants to try that out

    gcc 3.2 is a lot smarter about -Os and it makes a very big size
    difference according to the numbers the from the ACPI guys.

    Im not sure testing with a gcc from the last millenium is useful 8)

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:6.697 / U:0.012 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site